Feature release note for existing customers
Use when you ship an update and need to tell current users what changed and what they must do.
Fill in before running
Replace each placeholder with your own detail. The more specific you are, the less the model invents.
- {{PRODUCT_NAME}}
- {{CHANGES}}
- {{AFFECTED_USERS}}
- {{REQUIRED_ACTION_AND_DATE}}
- {{BREAKING_CHANGES}}
- {{DOCS_LINK}}
Getting a better result
- Put required actions above the feature news. Support volume comes from people who missed the action.
- Before and after phrasing is faster to read than a description of the new behavior alone.
- Absolute dates only. Relative dates break when someone reads the email a week later.
Questions about this prompt
When do I use this rather than the launch announcement prompt?
When the audience is existing customers and something they rely on has changed. A launch email sells a decision; a release note tells people what to do. If there is a required action or anything removed or renamed, this shape is right even when marketing would rather announce it.
What do I need to supply about the change?
Who is and is not affected, any required action with a date, everything removed, renamed or now behaving differently, and the docs link. Ambiguity in your change list comes back as a "needs clarification" item rather than a guess, so vague inputs return questions instead of copy.
What order does the release note come back in?
Subject and preheader stating the change rather than the excitement, a one sentence summary for the preview pane, a "what you need to do" section, changes written as before and after, removals with migration paths, and where to get help. The action section decides your support volume.
What is the mistake in a release note?
Putting the new feature above the required action because it reads better. Everyone who misses the action becomes a ticket. The other is relative dates: "next week" is wrong for anyone reading on Monday, which is why the prompt insists on absolute dates such as 12 March 2026.