Run every client site from one dashboard
Add each client as a separate website with its own crew, integrations and feed. Deliver always-on SEO and content as a productized service - with the activity log as your client report.
Client blog content in each brand voice, audit summaries, monthly reports.
Every client site in parallel, each with its own playbook.
Higher-margin retainers without hiring more hands.
Why marketing stalls for agencies
Production is where your margin goes
Every hour a writer spends is billed at cost. Leverage only arrives when the production line changes.
Reporting eats a day per account
Clients want to know what moved. Assembling that by hand, every month, is unbillable work.
Scaling means hiring
Five more clients means five more people, unless something else is doing the writing and publishing.
The crew, for agencies
Same teammates as every website, with responsibilities that fit the work. Rewrite any of them in your words.
Comparison pages, explainers and how-tos, twice a week
Checks whether assistants recommend you when buyers ask for alternatives
Earns links from sites in your field
Keeps the website healthy for search, explains what costs the most traffic first, and tells Page Optimizer what to fix.
Fixes the pages the audit flags: titles, descriptions and structured data, the most valuable pages first.
Keeps your connected channels active with posts people want to share, with a picture or video from the crew.
What else agencies could do instead
Freelancer and agency figures are typical market ranges, not quotes.
QuQi for agencies: common questions
Can I run several client sites without the work bleeding together?
Each site is its own workspace. Separate crawl, brand voice, keyword strategy, calendar and social connections, so a client's tone never leaks into another client's article. You switch between them in the console. Billing is per site at $134 a month, or $1,340 a year if you want the two months off.
Can I white-label it, or will clients see QuQi?
Nothing is branded. Articles publish to the client's own CMS under the client's byline, social posts go out from their own accounts, and images and videos carry no watermark. What you show the client is the work, and how you present the production line behind it is your business.
Does this replace my writers?
It replaces the production line, not the judgment. Agencies tend to put it on the volume work, the service pages and the monthly blog quota, and keep people on positioning, client calls and the pieces that need a real opinion. Your margin improves because the grind is cheaper, not because you fire the team.
What do I actually send the client each month?
The weekly report reads like a team update: what the audit found, what got fixed, what shipped, where rankings sit. Most agencies forward it or paste it into their own deck. Because it is written per site, you are not stitching together numbers from four different tools the night before the call.
Who approves the work, me or the client?
Whichever you prefer. Keep approvals with you and the client only ever sees finished pages, or hand them the calendar so they approve their own articles. Approval messages reach you wherever you are, so you can clear a week of drafts for three clients in one sitting.
What if a client leaves?
Everything already lives in their CMS and their social accounts, so there is nothing to hand over and nothing to migrate. You cancel that site's subscription and the other clients carry on untouched. The awkward conversation about who owns the content does not happen, because they always did.