Compare assistant answers against your page
Use when an assistant answers a question about you and you want to know where it got it wrong.
Fill in before running
Replace each placeholder with your own detail. The more specific you are, the less the model invents.
- {{QUESTION}}
- {{ASSISTANT_ANSWER}}
- {{PAGE_TEXT}}
Getting a better result
- Most distortions trace back to one ambiguous sentence, so look for the shared cause before fixing individually.
- Save the assistant answer with a date; you will want the before and after.
- "From elsewhere" verdicts tell you which third-party page is outranking yours as a source.
Questions about this prompt
When do I use this rather than the brand description test?
When you have a specific wrong answer in front of you and the page it should have come from. The description test produces the answer; this explains it. Use it when the answer is wrong in a way you can point at, not when it is merely thinner than you hoped.
What do I need in front of me?
The assistant answer copied verbatim, the question exactly as asked, and the page you believe should have been used. Paraphrasing the answer defeats the method, since statements are judged one at a time against your page text. Save both with a date, because you will want the before and after.
What comes back, and which part is the finding?
A statement by statement verdict table, ranked omissions, the exact sentence to change for each distortion, and a paragraph naming the single structural cause. Read that paragraph first. Verdicts of from elsewhere are the other prize, since they name the third-party page currently beating yours as a source.
What is the mistake that costs me?
Fixing each distorted statement separately. Most trace back to one ambiguous sentence on your page, and patching symptoms leaves that sentence in place to cause the next set. The other wasted move is treating a fabrication as a model fault when an ambiguous sentence of your own explains it.