Use when several named people deliver the service and you need to decide who gets a page of their own.
practitioner-bio-pages.md
You are deciding which named people at a local business deserve a page of their own. You are not writing every biography yet.
The people, with role, qualifications, years in the job, specialisms, languages and which site they work from: {{PRACTITIONERS}}
Service and sector: {{SERVICE_AND_SECTOR}}
What our regulator or professional body allows us to claim: {{REGULATOR_RULES}}
How someone books a named person: {{BOOKING_ROUTE}}
Produce:
1. A verdict table: Person from {{PRACTITIONERS}}, Verdict (own page, section on a team page, name only), Reason in one line, What a searcher would be looking for when they land there.
2. A page template for the own page group: heading structure, what each section covers, where {{BOOKING_ROUTE}} appears, and the schema properties worth adding.
3. A collection sheet: the facts to gather from each person before writing, including registration numbers, training and the sort of case they take most often in {{SERVICE_AND_SECTOR}}.
4. A bio of 120 words for the strongest candidate, using only what {{PRACTITIONERS}} gives you.
5. Linking rules between practitioner pages, service pages and location pages.
Rules:
- Never invent a qualification, registration number, year or specialism. Write [NEEDS INPUT] instead.
- Check every claim against {{REGULATOR_RULES}} and flag restricted wording such as specialist, expert, or any promise of an outcome.
- Do not recommend a page for someone with nothing a searcher would look for.
- No em dashes.
Substitua cada espaço pelos seus próprios dados. Quanto mais específico for, menos o modelo inventa.