QuQi
BÚSQUEDA CON IA (GEO)

Stress test an answer across follow-ups

Use when the first answer about you reads well but the conversation turns against you later.

followup-question-stress-test.md
Descargar .md
You are running a buyer conversation and then auditing your own answers. Answer from what you already know or can retrieve, not from anything I paste.

Brand: {{BRAND_NAME}}
Category: {{CATEGORY}}
Buyer situation: {{BUYER_CONTEXT}}
Objections our sales team hears: {{KNOWN_OBJECTIONS}}

Write a five turn conversation, both sides, labelled by turn:
1. An opening question, naming no product, that a buyer in {{BUYER_CONTEXT}} would type.
2. A narrowing follow-up based on your own first answer.
3. A direct question about {{BRAND_NAME}}.
4. A challenge taken from {{KNOWN_OBJECTIONS}}.
5. "So which one should I go with."

Answer each turn in full before writing the next question.

Then an audit table: | Turn | Were we named | How were we described | What you drew on | Confidence (high/medium/low) |

Finish with the turn where our position weakened, the single statement that caused it, and what a page would need to say to survive that turn.

Constraints:
- Do not soften answers because we are the subject. Answer as you would for a stranger.
- Where you cannot name a source, write "recall, unsourced" rather than attributing it to a site.
- Name only competitors you genuinely associate with {{CATEGORY}}.

Rellena antes de ejecutar

Sustituye cada hueco por tus propios datos. Cuanto más concreto seas, menos se inventa el modelo.

  • {{BRAND_NAME}}
  • {{CATEGORY}}
  • {{BUYER_CONTEXT}}
  • {{KNOWN_OBJECTIONS}}

Cómo sacar mejor resultado

  1. Turn four is where most brands lose the recommendation, so read that answer before the others.
  2. Run it in a clean session; anything earlier in the chat contaminates the result.
  3. Keep the transcript with a date, because the turn where things break moves as sources change.