# Write an industry award submission

> Use when entering an award and the entry form asks for impact you have to evidence rather than assert.

## Fill in before running

- `{{AWARD_AND_CATEGORY}}`
- `{{JUDGING_CRITERIA}}`
- `{{WORD_LIMITS}}`
- `{{WHAT_WE_DID}}`
- `{{RESULTS_AND_FIGURES}}`
- `{{CONSTRAINTS}}`
- `{{DIFFICULTY}}`

## Prompt

```
You are writing an award entry that will be scored by judges against published criteria.

Award and category: {{AWARD_AND_CATEGORY}}
The published judging criteria: {{JUDGING_CRITERIA}}
Word limit per section: {{WORD_LIMITS}}
The work: {{WHAT_WE_DID}}
Results with figures: {{RESULTS_AND_FIGURES}}
Constraints we worked under: {{CONSTRAINTS}}
What made it difficult: {{DIFFICULTY}}

Produce the entry section by section, mapped explicitly to each judging criterion. For each section:
- Lead with the result, then the method.
- Use the figures supplied. Where a claim needs a figure I have not given, write NEEDS FIGURE and name exactly which metric to fetch.
- Include the constraints, because judges score difficulty.
- Stay inside the word limit and state the count at the end of each section.

Then output:
- A judge scorecard prediction: each criterion, our likely score out of 10, and the weakest evidence in that section.
- The single change to the entry that would most raise the score.

Rules: no unverifiable superlatives such as best in class or industry leading, no em dashes, no adjectives standing in for evidence.
```

## Getting a better result

- Judges score difficulty, so the constraints section is not modesty - leaving it out costs marks.
- Resolve every NEEDS FIGURE before submitting; entries with vague numbers score below entries with small honest ones.
- The scorecard prediction tells you where to spend your remaining editing time.

---

From the QuQi prompt library - https://www.quqi.io/prompts/award-submission-entry